Genetics3 essays

Genetics3 essays Why is AIDS so difficult to cure? How does the AIDS virus attack the body? In 1979, the first reported AIDS case occurred in New York, and by mid-June 1981, unusual immune system failure among gay men was surfacing in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) initially name the disease GRID, or gay-related immune deficiency, because it was prominently found among homosexuals. It appeared to be a lifestyle-associated illness, linked to excessive stress to the immune system. Researchers believed that a highly infectious agent, which depleted T cells and could be transmitted through intercourse, blood, or blood products from mother to fetus, caused GRID. In July of 1982, the disease was renamed AIDS, or Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. Since then, the diseases origins, the factors affecting it, the causes behind it, the symptoms arising from it, the groups at risk from it, and the practices leading to it have been widely and comprehensively researched. Despite painstaking efforts and billions of dollars spent on research, despite the nume rous drugs created to control and relieve its various symptoms, there is still no cure for it. We ask the question, Why?. AIDS is caused by the human immunodeficiency virus, or HIV. HIVs coat of protein fits the receptors in certain types of white blood cells (T cells) in the human immune system. When the virus is taken into these cells, it reproduces and destroys the immune system cell in the process. It attacks the body by attacking the immune system, making the person susceptible to and defenseless against many infections that he or she would normally be able to fight off easily. In many cases, HIV infection leads to AIDS, which ultimately leads to death. HIV is a retrovirus that is transmitted by the exchange of bodily fluids usually through sexual acts and the sharing of drug needles, mother to infant transmission, and sometimes by the con...

Reaction Paper Divergent Essay Example

Reaction Paper Divergent Essay Example Reaction Paper Divergent Paper Reaction Paper Divergent Paper Divergent is an interesting movie, a typical science fiction action film that is totally entertaining. The movie starts with the narration of the main character Beatrice Prior, and from her narration I already have a conclusion that it will be a good film. In her narration, she discusses the kind of society they have which is divided into five factions. I was fascinated with the idea of having these five factions, each with its own unique characteristic portrayed in the film. The factions are presented through their different functions in the society, the lifestyle they have especially their manner of dressing, the beliefs that they hold on to, and the different culture that they have which we give emphasis on our paper. However, somehow contradict the statement of Beatrice saying that she does not belong in any Of the five faction for she is a Divergent- has more than one faction. For me, Beatrice is lucky to be a Divergent for it proves that she has more than one ability than becoming factionists. But she did make a choice to be part of one of the faction which is the Dauntless, the protector. I like the determination that she shows in order arrive the training and keep being a part of the Dauntless group. All in all, the movie was great. The characters are good as well as the graphics especially the battle part. The film also left some lessons which I think is very useful to many of the teenagers who are also confused in their state of life. One of which is Fear does not weaken you, it awakes you. After watching the movie, I began thinking of what faction do I want to belong with, and its the Amity group, Ive always wanted to be the scholar ones and because like color blue, and with these thinking realized how influential the movie is.

Eygpt Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Eygpt - Essay Example One can see an attempt from the part of the writer to draw the attention of the readers towards the malicious intentions of the western world, though it seems rather baseless to blame others for ones own inability to handle crisis. The writer points out that in Arab nations like Jordan and Iraq, the rulers appointed by the western world had no roots. In addition, the divisions of the Arab world after the fall of Ottoman Empire were aimed at creating conflicts rather than solving them. Another allegation is against US for its failure to solve the Arab-Israel conflict, and also for its supporting the Egyptian and Saudi Arabian governments which were not at able to handle their internal affairs. The writer also points out that some of these dictatorial governments have close links with America; thus an attempt to show the western malicious intentions (Shadid). Here one can see an attempt to dig into history to show how France and Britain exploited the area through Sykes Picot Agreement of 1916. However, the wrier admits that the western states could not be blamed for the inability of Arab nations to solve their problems themselves. Moreover, the Arab states forgot looking into their own internal affairs and instead, the rulers thought engaging in relentless conflict with Israel would appease their citizen, which has gone wrong as is evident from the recent state of affairs. The eruption of problems started in Egypt, which was considered an epitome of foreign relations to be adopted by other Arab nations. However, it seems rather surprising that even so many years could not solve any problems in the country it gave birth to new issues like Christian-Muslim divide. In Sudan, the blacks fight against the Arab rulers and in Iraq, the Shiites are preparing a return to power. Tunisia witnessed another fall of dictatorship due to the extreme frustration faced by people over joblessness and corruption. In total, the Arab world is fuming; wars against dictatorships, jobles sness, poverty and clashes among interest groups are all shattering the Arab world. It is warned that the coming years will face a great deal of destruction and devastation as a result of the anarchies existing in the Arab world and the absence of powerful leaders like Gamal Abdel Nasser who could cover up the issues. Shadid provides the example of Tunisian leader Habib Bourguiba to show how foolishly the new Arab leaders engage in unpopular activities, facing the wrath of people. He appeared drinking juice on television in the month of Ramadan, and the protest he will face in a Muslim community is clear. Thus, the article is an attempt to look into the reason behind the unrest that is shaking the entire Arab world. However, the writer, like all others, fails to predict the future. The issues in the Arab world starting from the fall of Iraq, and now very evident in many other Arab nations, reveal the fact that the people there are eager to achieve total freedom, democracy, developme nt and transformation. However, the pathetic thing is that due to lack of powerful social reformists, possibly due to the harsh regimes of Islam religion-centrism, people in the Arab world are still hopeless, aimless and irrational. The only thing they want to achieve is the kind of freedom people enjoy in other parts of the world. However, the ones who exhibit the power to lead are monarchs as is evident from Iraq and Egypt who do nothing for the welfare of the people or to control religions extremism. The Arab world is unlikely to